Post edited 2:01 pm – May 27, 2011 by Andrea_A
I think, the choice between an useless limb and regaining functions is clear in this case.
But those prostheses are expensive. And thirty years ago they hadn't such possibilities. I had a boy in my class at school who had lost a hand. The surgeons modified the stump finger-like, so he could grasp things (books, his schoolbag, etc.) with it.
DARPA has plans with wounded soldiers: "At DARPA, we have a vision of a future where a soldier who has lost an
extremity in battle will regain full use of that limb again" (Leutnant Geoff Ling). http://www.freerepublic.com/fo…..4772/posts
http://www.darpa.mil/WorkArea/…..px?id=2581 (somewhat propaganda)
But maybe there are also other ethical issues with body modifications. The case of mentally disabled "Ashley" has been discussed controversely. Their parents talked the physicians to stop her growth for easier care:
http://aapgrandrounds.aappubli…..act/17/1/2
http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/c…..60/10/1013
As last point I want to ask a question: Would a paraplegic electively want his legs amputated to get rid of useless weight and win the Paralympics?